Directwind.com

Endorphin @ 17/06/2016 - 10h43 a dit:

BB_253 @ 17/06/2016 - 10h30 a dit:

lis le BLS...

Bref comme tu finis par le reconna?tre toi m?me, les 94M sont bel et bien 94M de personnes "? part" sans emplois... "...

Heu non non je te rassure, clairement on ne lis pas les meme choses.


Je te remets TON graphe qui divise la population TOTALE:





Ou sont les 74M de moins de 18 ans (via census, lien plus haut. Tu denis ce chiffre?)?

Ou sont les 40M de retraites (via census >65 , ou via social security -ton chiffre- meme si les groupes ne sont pas exactement les meme)?

Ou sont les 20M d'etudiants (lien plus haut)?


Ca fait 150M+ de personnes... Ou sont ils dans ce graphe qui couvre la population globale (320M)?


Reponds a ces 3 questions, pas a cote comme les pages precendentes et on peut continuer sinon c'est pas la peine.

Endorphin @ 17/06/2016 - 11h38 a dit:

Mouarf. Je savais que t'allais répondre à mes questions par d'autres questions. Typique. Tous les liens pour mes chiffres sont inclus. C'est dommage d'être incapable d'analyser et critiquer un simple graphe. Aller je te laisse à tes certitudes. Bisous.

BB_253 @ 17/06/2016 - 12h12 a dit:

Endorphin @ 17/06/2016 - 11h38 a dit:

Mouarf. Je savais que t'allais répondre à mes questions par d'autres questions. Typique. Tous les liens pour mes chiffres sont inclus. C'est dommage d'être incapable d'analyser et critiquer un simple graphe. Aller je te laisse à tes certitudes. Bisous.

mdr, quelle mauvaise foi, chacun jugera, tout est écrit, suffit de relire...

A commencer par "ta" demande de répondre en utilisant "mon" graph du census bureau... omg, t'es indécrottable (j'comprends mieux le terme "moutons" pour certains us citizens qui gobent tout, malgré les évidences  

thejoker @ 19/06/2016 - 19h07 a dit:

BB_253 @ 17/06/2016 - 12h12 a dit:

Endorphin @ 17/06/2016 - 11h38 a dit:

Bla.

Blabla

prenez de la hauteur sortez de la grotte vous avez vu cette hypothèse?

http://reseauinternational.net/les-etats-unis-apres-leur-chute/

But there’s one statistic that has been vexing economists. The size of the nation’s workforce -- known as the labor force participation rate -- continues to fall. Since the start of the downturn, the percentage of that population that has a job or is looking for one has dropped more than 3 percentage points, to 62.6 percent, a level not seen since the 1970s.


The problem is particularly pronounced among men between the ages of 25 and 54, traditionally considered the prime working years. Their participation rate has been declining for decades, but the drop-off accelerated during the recession. The high mark was 98 percent in 1954, and it now stands at 88 percent. A new analysis from the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, slated for release Monday, found that the United States now has the third-lowest participation rate for “prime-age men” among the world’s developed countries.


In other words, Greece, Slovenia and Turkey have a larger share of men in their workforces than the United States does. The United States beats only Italy and Israel.

Le_Touriste @ 20/06/2016 - 15h39 a dit:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/06/20/why-americas-men-arent-working/?hpid=hp_hp-more-top-stories_working-men-wb-825a-stream%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

But there’s one statistic that has been vexing economists. The size of the nation’s workforce -- known as the labor force participation rate -- continues to fall. Since the start of the downturn, the percentage of that population that has a job or is looking for one has dropped more than 3 percentage points, to 62.6 percent, a level not seen since the 1970s.


The problem is particularly pronounced among men between the ages of 25 and 54, traditionally considered the prime working years. Their participation rate has been declining for decades, but the drop-off accelerated during the recession. The high mark was 98 percent in 1954, and it now stands at 88 percent. A new analysis from the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, slated for release Monday, found that the United States now has the third-lowest participation rate for “prime-age men” among the world’s developed countries.


In other words, Greece, Slovenia and Turkey have a larger share of men in their workforces than the United States does. The United States beats only Italy and Israel.