Oui, j'avais bien noté la différence d'écran de visualisation. Mais je ne l'ai pas mis dans mes critères car je juge peut-être à tord que ce n'est pas primordiale.
Concernant le mode super sport, il est décrit dans ce test en bas de page de pixmania:
http://www.pixmania.com/fr/fr/12589937/art/olympus/tough-tg-1-ihs-silver.htmlLors de photos avec le nouveau mode Super Sports, la prise de vue en rafale à 5 images/sec est disponible en maintenant le bouton de déclenchement enfoncé puisque l'appareil photo est fixé sur le mode priorité vitesse. Ce nouveau mode idéal pour le sport indoor ou les activités sportives rapides permet de capturer des mouvements rapides sans difficulté, à la différence du précédent mode Sports.
Le TG1 est quand même un peu descendu dans cet article, non...? Notamment ses perfs avec le f/2, son focus, et sa qualité d'image en grand angle... ou alors j'ai rien compris, ce qui est possible également...
http://www.pocket-lint.com/review/5922/olympus-tough-tg-1-waterproof-shockproof-dustproof-compact-camera-reviewThe TG-1’s headline feature is that it has an f/2.0 lens. But don’t be over-sold: it’s f/2.0 at the 25mm wide-angle, reduced to f/4.9 at the 100mm equivalent, which is the full extent of the TG-1’s 4x optical zoom.
But the aperture is often irrelevant. There’s no aperture priority or manual control to select, so it’s always down to the camera whether or not f/2.0 is used or not. Why include features that can’t be used to their fullest?
The camera’s autofocus system is reasonably quick but, frustratingly, we found it would often ignore the main subject and focus behind. The iESP system is designed to check both centre and surrounding areas for contrast to focus on the most relevant subject part - but this often failed to deliver in our practical tests. It may have a fancy name, but it’s far less fancy in use.
For example, the TG-1’s 25mm wide-angle setting is fine, but edge softness is apparent as are purple fringes from scenes with backlighting.
The TG-1’s 12-megapixel sensor can capture images from ISO 100-6400, but quality takes a dive from the mid-ISO settings.
We struggled to get the camera to shoot upwards of ISO 800 (when set to auto) even in the darkest of conditions, though even at this setting colour is far more muted and detail lacks compared to the lower ISO shots.
The f/2.0 lens may sound great but the lack of aperture priority or manual control detracts from its use.
Zoom performance is also slow, and while autofocus is quick it’s often inaccurate, while image quality is nothing to write home about.
Vous en pensez quoi ...????
elle s'en fou...
